META-ANALYSIS: COMPARISON OF NEW PUBLIC SERVICES IN DEVELOPED AND DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

Linayati Lestari, Arian Yunita Putri Watu, Muhammad Iskandar, Fendi Hidayat, Wiyono Wiyono

Abstract


This research aims to determine the development of new public services in developed and developing countries in the last six years. To find out, the author has reviewed hundreds of journals that discuss new public services in developed and developing countries with editions over the previous six years, namely from 2015 to 2021. Then, the author compares the concepts used in new public services in developed and developing countries. This research uses qualitative methods with a previous review. The data sources in the study are selected articles in the Scopus database in the last six years. Selected items are publications that are relevant to the topic of new public services in developed and developing countries. The results of this research were obtained through the data analysis process of VosViewer and Nvivo 12 plus software. The research results show that 56 concepts examine new public services in developed countries and categorize them into 8 clusters. Meanwhile, new public services in developing countries have 32 concepts and 1 Cluster. The relevance of this research is the discovery of a concept mapping of new public services in developed and developing countries to assist in developing a conceptual framework for further recent public service studies. Its novelty can be seen in other research

Keywords


Analysis; New Public Services; Developed Countries; Developing Country

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agostino, D., Arnaboldi, M., & Lema, M. D. (2020). New development: COVID-19 as an accelerator of digital transformation in public service delivery. Public Money and Management, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2020.1764206

Bolívar, M. P. R. (2017). Governance Models for the Delivery of Public Services Through the Web 2.0 Technologies: A Political View in Large Spanish Municipalities. Social Science Computer Review, 35(2), 203–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315609919

Brogaard, L., & Helby Petersen, O. (2021). Privatization of Public Services: A Systematic Review of Quality Differences between Public and Private Daycare Providers. International Journal of Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.1909619

Chakir, A., Chergui, M., & Andry, J. F. (2020). A Smart Updater IT Governance Platform Based on Artificial Intelligence. Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems, 5(5), 47–53. https://doi.org/10.25046/aj050507

Clifton, J., Fuentes, D. D., & García, G. L. (2020). ICT-enabled co-production of public services: Barriers and enablers. A systematic review. Information Polity, 25(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-190122

De Classe, T. M., De Araujo, R. M., Xexéo, G. B., & Siqueira, S. W. M. (2021). Public Processes Are Open for Play. Digital Government: Research and Practice, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.1145/3474879

Deja, M., Rak, D., & Bell, B. (2021). Digital transformation readiness: perspectives on academia and library outcomes in information literacy. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(5), 102403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102403

Denhardt, J. V, & Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The New Public Service Revisited. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 664–672. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12347

Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics, 105(3), 1809–1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z

Fenwick, M., McCahery, J. A., & Vermeulen, E. P. M. (2019). The End of ‘Corporate’ Governance: Hello ‘Platform’ Governance. European Business Organization Law Review, 20(1), 171–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-019-00137-z

Feroz, A. K., Zo, H., & Chiravuri, A. (2021). Digital transformation and environmental sustainability: A review and research agenda. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031530

Fredriksson, A. (2017). Location-allocation of public services – Citizen access, transparency and measurement. A method and evidence from Brazil and Sweden. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 59, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2016.09.008

Knaus, T. (2020). Technology criticism and data literacy: The case for an augmented understanding of media literacy. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 12(3), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.23860/JMLE-2020-12-3-2

Luna-Reyes, L. F. (2017). Opportunities and challenges for digital governance in a world of digital participation. Information Polity, 22(2–3), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-170408

Mayston, D. J. (2015). Analysing the effectiveness of public service producers with endogenous resourcing. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 44(1), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-014-0428-5

McQuiston, J., & Manoharan, A. P. (2021). E-Government and information technology coursework in public administration programs in Asia. Teaching Public Administration, 39(2), 210–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739420978249

Osborne, S. P., Powell, M., Cui, T., & Strokosch, K. (2021). New development: ‘Appreciate–Engage–Facilitate’—The role of public managers in value creation in public service ecosystems. Public Money and Management, 41(8), 668–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2021.1916189

Park-Lee, S. (2020). Contexts of briefing for service design procurements in the Finnish public sector. Design Studies, 69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2020.05.002

Perry, J. L. (2007). Democracy and the new public service. American Review of Public Administration, 37(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074006296091

Petrescu, C., & Mihalache, F. (2020). Perceptions towards the quality of public services in Romania. Poor outcomes of public administration reforms? Calitatea Vietii, 31(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.46841/rcv.2020.03.04

Sehl, A. (2020). Public service media in a digital media environment: Performance from an audience perspective. Media and Communication, 8(3), 359–372. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i3.3141

Suksi, M. (2021). Administrative due process when using automated decision-making in public administration: some notes from a Finnish perspective. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 29(1), 87–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-020-09269-x

van Nunen, K., Li, J., Reniers, G., & Ponnet, K. (2018). Bibliometric analysis of safety culture research. Safety Science, 108, 248–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.08.011

Wiyono, Purnomo, E. P., & Lestari, L. (2023). Culture of Corruption in the Smart Service System of Global Governance. Chinese Public Administration Review, 1 –11. https://doi.org/10.1177/15396754231185320

Wiyono, W., Qodir, Z., & Lestari, L. (2023). Online Media Trends on Political Party Sentiment Ahead of the 2024 Election in Indonesia. Journal of Governance, 8(1), 76–100. https://doi.org/10.31506/jog.v8i1.17880

Wiyono, W., & Nurmandi, A. (2022). Smart Transportation Development: Success Strategy in China, United States, United Kingdom, and India. Human Interaction and Emerging Technologies (IHIET 2022): Artificial Intelligence and Future Applications, 68(Ihiet), 188–195. https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1002731




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33373/icms.v1i1.17

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


PROCEEDING SERIES

Published & Managed by : LPPM University of Riau Kepulauan

Address : Jln. Pahlawan No. 99. Bukit Tempayan, Batu Aji, Batam, Kepulauan Riau Province, Indonesia

Email: lppm.unrika@gmail.com; proceeding.icms@unrika.ac.id

e-ISSN:3047-6399

Procceding ICMS © 2023 by Universitas Riau Kepulauan is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International